"Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In any case, I think Michael is opting to skip this proposal for now.
At least for the time being, yes. I think Lucene doesn't (yet) need this and we should stick with straightforward setters/args-to-constructors for now. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]