"Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> In any case, I think Michael is opting to skip this proposal for now.

At least for the time being, yes.  I think Lucene doesn't (yet) need
this and we should stick with straightforward
setters/args-to-constructors for now.

Mike

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to