OK, I'll wait until they are supported in future release. (2.4?) 2007/12/10, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > OK, excellent. I just wanted to make sure this thread is still > "alive" :) This is an important optimization to decrease cost of > opening & re-opening searchers. > > Mike > > Michael Busch wrote: > > > Michael McCandless wrote: > >> > >> I haven't really looked closely at these (I've been focusing on the > >> indexing side of the house so far!), but, I do think these ideas are > >> important to pursue soon (after 2.3). We do really need reopen at > >> the > >> IndexSearcher level to be as fast as it can be. > >> > >> Is anyone actively working on this? > >> > >> Mike > >> > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > I haven't worked on the column-stored fields (aka per-doc > > payloads ;) ) > > yet, but I was planning to start after 2.3 is out. In Atlanta on the > > ApacheCon, we had a search BOF and people seemed to be really excited > > about this feature, especially if those fields will be updateable. Of > > course then it makes total sense to change the FieldCache to load the > > data from those new fields and also enable it to only reload the > > values > > from the changed segments during re-open. > > > > So yeah, I was planning to start on these patches soon, and of course > > any help is more than welcome! :-) I think we should start to make a > > good design soon, then we can decide who is going to implement what > > and > > hopefully get some of the new features in 2.4. > > > > -Michael > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
