Thanks you all. Do you think such a feature will ever be included in Lucene "standard"?
MC On 12/15/07, Timo Nentwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 14 December 2007 16:56:07 Sean Timm wrote: > > See LUCENE-997 > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997 > > I actually have had this problem (ran into a synchronized{} bottleneck in > FSDirectory) and "fixed" it by introducing a pool of Searchers (each > allocates memory and each holds QueryFilter redundantly cached in a > WeakHashMap...) and do deny queries if the pool is exhausted. > > The FAQ does not recommend this approach. Well, I don't like it as well but > how to deal with this real-real-world problem otherwise? > > > -Sean > > > > Moreno Carullo wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > I'm going to implement a way to start a search on Lucene with a > > > user-defined timeout. > > > This is really useful when you have to deal with very strict SLA, and for > > > what I have seen from the source code, this feature is still missing. > > > > > > Has anyone start doing something similar? > > > Does my future patch has any chance to be included in standard lucene? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Moreno Carullo email // moreno.carullo (at) pulc (dot) it web // http://moreno.pulc.it/ skype // morec82 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
