On Dec 18, 2007 1:09 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Based on the comment in the if condition, I am assuming the field
> numbers are not identical in this clause, which would explain the fact
> that the Fields info is being misinterpreted.

Did you change the schema then add some more data?
Perhaps this bug is being tickled when a segment with a stored field
is merged with
one where the same field is unstored?

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to