On Jan 17, 2008, at 2:42 PM, Bill Janssen wrote:
Examples of the former issue include things like removing
deprecations sooner and the ability to add new methods to interfaces
(both of these are not to be done ad-hoc)
What would be the difference between ad-hoc and non-ad-hoc?
Maybe bad choice of words, but I meant to say that no interface/
deprecation changes would be done without announcing it and there
being at least one release in the meantime. Thus, if we wanted to add
isFancySchmancy() onto Fieldable today, it would have to be announced,
patch provided and referenced, a release without it (i.e. 2.3) and
then it would be available in 2.4. By ad-hoc, I meant that we
wouldn't just announce it and then have it show up in 2.3 and not give
people time to digest it.
HTH,
Grant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
