[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566624#action_12566624
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1084:
--------------------------------------------
Yeah, the intention here was that you specify LIMITED or UNLIMITED enum
parameter on creating the IW, and then change the actual limit using
setMaxFieldLength.
But I agree it'd be cleaner if you could actually just set the limit (once) on
construction.
I think if we stopped subclassing from Parameter (we don't really need
Serializable here?), and made the ctor public, then you could pass in "new
MaxFieldLength(100000)" to make your own limit?
> increase default maxFieldLength?
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1084
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 2.2
> Reporter: Daniel Naber
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 2.4
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1084.patch
>
>
> To my understanding, Lucene 2.3 will easily index large documents. So
> shouldn't we get rid of the 10,000 default limit for the field length? 10,000
> isn't that much and as Lucene doesn't have any error logging by default, this
> is a common problem for users that is difficult to debug if you don't know
> where to look.
> A better new default might be Integer.MAX_VALUE.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
