I think, if you give it the same name, it just grays out the old
ones. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550 for an
example.
Thus, I prefer #3, but am fine with #2 as well. #3 makes it easier,
IMO, to find the latest.
-Grant
On Mar 11, 2008, at 10:26 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
I like #2.
I don't think we should delete/replace attachments in Jira. The
history can be useful.
Mike
eks dev wrote:
Michael, others
what is Lucene/Jira best practice for new versions of the same patch:
1. delete existing / add new patch wit the same name
2. add new patch with some funky version e.g. "Jira-1219-take3.patch"
3. just add new patch with the same name
?
__________________________________________________________
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
The World's Favourite Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Next Training: April 7, 2008 at ApacheCon Europe in Amsterdam
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
