[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12594464#action_12594464
 ] 

Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1279:
----------------------------------

a few random thoughts:

1) you should be able to at least start the enumerator by skiping to a term 
consisting of the lowerTermField and the termText of "" ... even if the 
Collation of the term text is random, you still know which field you want.

2) why can a collator only be specified by a Locale, why not just let people 
specify the Collator they want directly?

3) instead of adding a new public CollatingRangeQuery, would it make more sense 
to add an optional Collator to RangeQuery (and RangeFilter) which triggers a 
different code path when non null?  (from a performance standpoint it would 
basically be one conditional check at the begining of the rewrite method.)

4) when i first saw the thread that spawned this issue, my first reaction was 
to wonder if it would make sense to start allowing a Collator to be specified 
when indexing, and to use the raw bytes from the CollationKey as the indexed 
value -- I haven't thought it through very hard, but i wonder if that would be 
feasible (it seems like it would certainly faster at query time, since it would 
allow more traditional term skipping.

> RangeQuery and RangeFilter should use collation to check for range inclusion
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1279
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1279
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.1
>            Reporter: Steven Rowe
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.4
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1279.patch
>
>
> See [this java-user 
> discussion|http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-td16977096.html] of 
> problems caused by Unicode code-point comparison, instead of collation, in 
> RangeQuery.
> RangeQuery could take in a Locale via a setter, which could be used with a 
> java.text.Collator and/or CollationKey's, to handle ranges for languages 
> which have alphabet orderings different from those in Unicode.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to