Thanks guys, I guess I checked nabble too quickly. It's still happening too. Should a moderator perhaps try removing [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the list and email them to re-subscribe after the've fixed their problems?
-Yonik On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:21 AM, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I get the same thing, and I definitely saw your post, Yonik, twice. > > Mike > > Karl Wettin wrote: > >> I think that is a bounce from some a subscriber, sending the bounce to you >> instead of the list. I got the same yesterday when posting to java-users. >> But looking at nabble my posts are there. >> >> karl >> >> 10 jul 2008 kl. 03.23 skrev Yonik Seeley: >> >>> sorry for the noise... this is just a test to java-dev. >>> I'm unable to post to java-user, and trying to re-subscribe didn't help. >>> Full text of the bounce email below, in case anyone else is seeing this. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> >>> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Received: by 10.114.75.13 with SMTP id x13cs2248waa; >>> Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT) >>> Received: by 10.143.168.4 with SMTP id v4mr2332544wfo.39.1215618777288; >>> Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT) >>> Return-Path: <> >>> Received: from spwiki.spsoftware.com ([61.17.14.87]) >>> by mx.google.com with ESMTP id >>> 28si10149607wfd.4.2008.07.09.08.52.51; >>> Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:52:57 -0700 (PDT) >>> Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 61.17.14.87 is neither permitted >>> nor denied by best guess record for domain of spwiki.spsoftware.com) >>> client-ip=61.17.14.87; >>> Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: >>> 61.17.14.87 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for >>> domain of spwiki.spsoftware.com) smtp.mail= >>> Received: from localhost (localhost) >>> by spwiki.spsoftware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) id m69Fni50017713; >>> Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:44 +0530 >>> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:44 +0530 >>> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status; >>> boundary="m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com" >>> Subject: Returned mail: see transcript for details >>> Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure) >>> >>> This is a MIME-encapsulated message >>> >>> --m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com >>> >>> The original message was received at Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:38 +0530 >>> from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1] >>> >>> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors ----- >>> spsoft >>> (reason: 550 5.1.1 User unknown) >>> (expanded from: root) >>> >>> ----- Transcript of session follows ----- >>> 550 5.1.1 spsoft... User unknown >>> >>> --m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com >>> Content-Type: message/delivery-status >>> >>> Reporting-MTA: dns; spwiki.spsoftware.com >>> Received-From-MTA: DNS; localhost.localdomain >>> Arrival-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:38 +0530 >>> >>> Final-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> X-Actual-Recipient: RFC822; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Action: failed >>> Status: 5.1.1 >>> Diagnostic-Code: X-Unix; 550 5.1.1 User unknown >>> Last-Attempt-Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:44 +0530 >>> >>> --m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com >>> Content-Type: message/rfc822 >>> >>> Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Received: from spwiki.spsoftware.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) >>> by spwiki.spsoftware.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id >>> m69FnP51017710 >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:19:38 +0530 >>> Received: from pop.spsoftindia.com >>> by spwiki.spsoftware.com with POP3 (fetchmail-6.3.8) >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (multi-drop); Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:19:38 >>> +0530 (IST) >>> Received: from mx05.mfg.onr.siteprotect.com (unknown [192.168.33.227]) >>> by mf20.mfg.onr.chicago.hostway (Postfix) with ESMTP id >>> 14DF224302C9 >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:51:24 >>> -0500 (CDT) >>> Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.2]) >>> by mx05.mfg.onr.siteprotect.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A72CA55C08F >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 10:51:23 >>> -0500 (CDT) >>> Received: (qmail 12837 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jul 2008 15:51:16 -0000 >>> Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run by ezmlm >>> Precedence: bulk >>> List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> List-Id: <java-user.lucene.apache.org> >>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Received: (qmail 12826 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jul 2008 15:51:16 -0000 >>> Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) >>> (140.211.11.136) >>> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:51:16 -0700 >>> X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 >>> tests=SPF_PASS >>> X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org >>> Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> designates 209.85.146.176 as permitted sender) >>> Received: from [209.85.146.176] (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) >>> (209.85.146.176) >>> by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 15:50:25 +0000 >>> Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id l24so1896286waf.11 >>> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:50:47 -0700 >>> (PDT) >>> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; >>> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >>> h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender >>> :to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type >>> :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references >>> :x-google-sender-auth; >>> bh=yHUDkAhyxx3RzkPEXm+GhBALbeHht91V/66plEV8gO8=; >>> b=NH6ujX2hhaQvCqg7KCwR373EjikxQyKEzlXwkt5lz+j62yTknBLsCwT9IgJwnFpamn >>> >>> hGXFK603oY07kz7R6v+7aU3xDjQhHqSXgAPE9TuIgXjEeUI8Fsx5BGzGGBje7GcqjfRQ >>> tFIbj0adZEirwETLEb9ZJrBklVUT0TGHlRI5c= >>> DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; >>> d=gmail.com; s=gamma; >>> h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version >>> :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition >>> :references:x-google-sender-auth; >>> b=HV/ayVpqHLaVUcEAqEREGNC585TvdCfPOnkxOyLWCFx4GkIaSxYa6wI2rPjxFz3ytp >>> >>> WCxeOpjGRJqhiEDXOUAoQUljIu/DCtZFMHvKeaJemhNc9fWqARg/I7ZSWpgJmxykC0Lz >>> 71KtcK+tRFjKfT+bMVixuNFtrwPGcTm37hIpA= >>> Received: by 10.115.92.2 with SMTP id u2mr9590818wal.33.1215618647304; >>> Wed, 09 Jul 2008 08:50:47 -0700 (PDT) >>> Received: by 10.114.75.13 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jul 2008 08:50:47 -0700 (PDT) >>> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Date: Wed, 9 Jul 2008 11:50:47 -0400 >>> From: "Yonik Seeley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: Re: performance feedback >>> In-Reply-To: >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> MIME-Version: 1.0 >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >>> Content-Disposition: inline >>> References: >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 997289174ea68835 >>> X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >>> Mail-Filter-Gateway: Found to be Virus Free >>> X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-SpamDetectionEngine: NOT SPAM, >>> MailFilterGateway Engine (Not Cached, Score=0, Score Required 5, >>> autolearn=disabled) >>> X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-From: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> X-Spam-Status: No >>> X-Fetchmail-Warning: recipient address [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> didn't match any local name >>> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 192.168.10.9 >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Beard, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I will try tweaking RAM, and check about autoCommit=false. It's on the >>>> future agenda to multi-thread through the index writer. The indexing >>>> time I quoted includes the document creation time which would definitely >>>> improve with multi-threading. >>>> >>>> I'm doing batch updates of up to 1000 a pop, and closing and re-opening >>>> the IndexWriter in between. >>> >>> autoCommit=false will definitely help, and there is normally no reason >>> not to use it. >>> Bigger batches (or a single batch) will also help indexing speed. A >>> single IndexWriter session can now avoid copying stored fields on >>> segment merges. >>> >>> -Yonik >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> --m69Fni50017713.1215618584/spwiki.spsoftware.com-- >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
