[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12618272#action_12618272
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1340:
--------------------------------------------

Sigh, I too missed that we broke back-compatibility.

But I agree: let's mark Fieldable interface as being allowed to change from 
release to release (consciously make an exception to back compatibility 
requirements).

Let's also transition away from interface for Field, for 3.0   EG we last had 
discussions on this, here:

    http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-dev/200803.mbox/[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]



> Make it posible not to include TF information in index
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1340
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1340
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Eks Dev
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1340.patch, LUCENE-1340.patch, LUCENE-1340.patch, 
> LUCENE-1340.patch, LUCENE-1340.patch, LUCENE-1340.patch, LUCENE-1340.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 24h
>  Remaining Estimate: 24h
>
> Term Frequency is typically not needed  for all fields, some CPU (reading one 
> VInt less and one X>>>1...) and IO can be spared by making pure boolen fields 
> possible in Lucene. This topic has already been discussed and accepted as a 
> part of Flexible Indexing... This issue tries to push things a bit faster 
> forward as I have some concrete customer demands.
> benefits can be expected for fields that are typical candidates for Filters, 
> enumerations, user rights, IDs or very short "texts", phone  numbers, zip 
> codes, names...
> Status: just passed standard test (compatibility), commited for early review, 
> I have not tried new feature, missing some asserts and one two unit tests
> Complexity: simpler than expected
> can be used via omitTf() (who used omitNorms() will know where to find it :)  

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to