[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1366?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1366:
---------------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-1366.patch
OK, this patch switches over all uses of the old names to the new ones.
I plan to commit in a day or two.
> Rename Field.Index.UN_TOKENIZED/TOKENIZED/NO_NORMS
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1366
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1366
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 1.9, 2.0.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.3.1, 2.3.2
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.4
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1366.patch, LUCENE-1366.patch
>
>
> There is confusion about these current Field options and I think we
> should rename them, deprecating the old names in 2.4/2.9 and removing
> them in 3.0. How about this:
> {code}
> TOKENIZED --> ANALYZED
> UN_TOKENIZED --> NOT_ANALYZED
> NO_NORMS --> NOT_ANALYZED_NO_NORMS
> {code}
> Should we also add ANALYZED_NO_NORMS?
> Spinoff from here:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-user/200808.mbox/%3C48a3076a.2679420a.1c53.ffffa5c4%40mx.google.com%3E
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
