[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1380?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12630768#action_12630768
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1380:
-------------------------------------
>> One could argue that what you should do rather than using this patch is to
>> add a TokenFilter that sets all positionIncrement to 0.
>Really? You'll have to excuse me - i am very new to Lucene.
>How would i go about that? Such a TokenFilter exists already?
{code:java}
new TokenFilter(input) {
public Token next(Token reusableToken) throws IOException {
reusableToken = input.next(reusableToken);
reusableToken.setPositionIncrement(0);
return reusableToken;
}
};
{code}
> Patch for ShingleFilter.enablePositions
> ---------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1380
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1380
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: contrib/analyzers
> Reporter: Michael Semb Wever
> Assignee: Karl Wettin
> Fix For: 2.4
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1380.patch, LUCENE-1380.patch
>
>
> Make it possible for *all* words and shingles to be placed at the same
> position.
> Default is to place each shingle at the same position as the unigram (or
> first shingle if outputUnigrams=false). That is, each coterminal token has
> positionIncrement=1 and every other token a positionIncrement=0.
> This leads to a MultiPhraseQuery where at least one word/shingle must be
> matched from each word/token. This is not always desired.
> See http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.user/34746 for
> mailing list thread.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
