Michael McCandless wrote:

I think *not* having to maintain back compat of the package private APIs is very important to keeping our freedom (and sanity!) to continue to improve Lucene. This is similar to marking a new API as experimental and subject to suddenly change in the next release: it reserves our future freedom.

Still, I think it's OK if advanced sources want to tap into package private APIs as long as we've made this policy clear.

I agree we should explicitly call this out, clearly, in the BackwardsCompatbility wiki -- Michael can you update it?

OK, it seems that everyone is ok with this. I will update the wiki.

-Michael


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to