[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646563#action_12646563
 ] 

Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1448:
-------------------------------------

bq. Second: I can't figure out how to ask StandardTokenizerImpl for the number 
of chars it pulled from the Reader. Can someone (who understands JFlex well) 
help out here?

Whats wrong with?

<code>

  public int getFinalOffset() {
    return scanner.yychar() + scanner.yylength();
  }

</code>

> add getFinalOffset() to TokenStream
> -----------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1448
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Analysis
>            Reporter: Michael McCandless
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1448.patch
>
>
> If you add multiple Fieldable instances for the same field name to a 
> document, and you then index those fields with TermVectors storing offsets, 
> it's very likely the offsets for all but the first field instance will be 
> wrong.
> This is because IndexWriter under the hood adds a cumulative base to the 
> offsets of each field instance, where that base is 1 + the endOffset of the 
> last token it saw when analyzing that field.
> But this logic is overly simplistic.  For example, if the WhitespaceAnalyzer 
> is being used, and the text being analyzed ended in 3 whitespace characters, 
> then that information is lost and then next field's offsets are then all 3 
> too small.  Similarly, if a StopFilter appears in the chain, and the last N 
> tokens were stop words, then the base will be 1 + the endOffset of the last 
> non-stopword token.
> To fix this, I'd like to add a new getFinalOffset() to TokenStream.  I'm 
> thinking by default it returns -1, which means "I don't know so you figure it 
> out", meaning we fallback to the faulty logic we have today.
> This has come up several times on the user's list.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to