[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12646594#action_12646594
 ] 

Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1424:
---------------------------------------

Since this was committed I get a test failure when I run
  'ant -Dtag=lucene_2_4_0 test-tag'

    [junit] Testcase: 
testRange(org.apache.lucene.queryParser.TestQueryParser):FAILED
    [junit] null
    [junit] junit.framework.AssertionFailedError
    [junit]     at 
org.apache.lucene.queryParser.TestQueryParser.testRange(TestQueryParser.java:418)

Seems like this might have broken backwards-compatibility. I haven't looked 
into the reason yet.

> Change all multi-term querys so that they extend MultiTermQuery and allow for 
> a constant score mode
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1424
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1424
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch, 
> LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch, 
> LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch, 
> LUCENE-1424.patch, LUCENE-1424.patch
>
>
> Cleans up a bunch of code duplication, closer to how things should be - 
> design wise, gives us constant score for all the multi term queries, and 
> allows us at least the option of highlighting the constant score queries 
> without much further work.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to