[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12647181#action_12647181
]
otis edited comment on LUCENE-524 at 11/13/08 7:06 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the description, yes. Doesn't this also sound a lot like that old
Mark H's LUCENE-329 issue?
was (Author: otis):
Based on the description, yes. Doesn't this also sound a lot like that old
Mark H's issue that you commented on earlier?
> Current implementation of fuzzy and wildcard queries inappropriately
> implemented as Boolean query rewrites
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-524
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-524
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 1.9
> Reporter: Randy Puttick
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: MultiTermQuery.java, MultiTermScorer.java
>
>
> The implementation of MultiTermQuery in terms of BooleanQuery introduces
> several problems:
> 1) Collisions with maximum clause limit on boolean queries which throws an
> exception. This is most problematic because it is difficult to ascertain in
> advance how many terms a fuzzy query or wildcard query might involve.
> 2) The boolean disjunctive scoring is not appropriate for either fuzzy or
> wildcard queries. In effect the score is divided by the number of terms in
> the query which has nothing to do with the relevancy of the results.
> 3) Performance of disjunctive boolean queries for large term sets is quite
> sub-optimal
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
