Mark Miller wrote:
It is dangerous, but probably not any more dangerous than using a consumer hard drive that lies to sync (don't know the numbers, but I have to assume some/many are doing this with Lucene - in which case you pay perf for a false sense of security<g>).
Well, if the consumer drive is in fact lying, then sync should be wicked fast ;) So you get a false sense of security without paying anything!
Not a real suggestion at this point though. Just thinking about some of the reports I have seen of much slower indexing with 2.4 (the latest being to the solr list today). Can't imagine why someone would see such a drastic change (I imagine you could imagine a lot better), other than maybe the sync is hobbling their specific situation (in which case i'd guess its not lying if it where going to be so slow though <g> Or its AIX or something <g>). Would be cool to be able to flip it off and test. Sounds like thats simple enough already though. I could whip up an off for solr testing easy enough.
Yeah let's dig down and get to the root cause here -- if turning off sync in fact fixes the slowdown we should understand why sync is being called so often.
Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
