On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Timo Nentwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > IMHO it doesn't make much sense that trimTrailingZeros() doesn't shrink the > array. Sure the arraycopy() will take some extra time and simply adjusting > wlen still has the benefit that it will probably speed up the bit set > operations as there are less bits to be operated on.
I think you just made the case that the current semantics do make sense. In any case, stuff like this is exactly why OpenBitSet was designed to be "open" - you're not locked out of doing it yourself. -Yonik > On the other hand if you have a lot of bit sets and use to serialize them you > will waste memory (and time). > > I think there should be at least a additional method that explicitly frees the > memory. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
