[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12655760#action_12655760
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1487:
-------------------------------------
Hold out Tim, your likely to get further comments before it goes in. I think
Otis was just suggesting we start with those changes. Once your code is in the
right format, your more likely to get a committer to spend some time with it.
Sometimes we just reformat and add the tests ourselves depending on a host of
factors, but in general, your more likely to get good comments faster if that
work has already been done.
Its a fair question to ask if the idea is sound, but just posting the work
doesn't necessarily imply that you are looking for that advice before putting
more work into what you have done. And many times questions do go unanswered,
they are missed, people don't have the time at the moment - so its best to
supply all of this stuff, unless you are prepared for a wait if their is no
current interest in going over the patch.
> FieldCacheTermsFilter
> ---------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1487
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1487
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Reporter: Tim Sturge
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: FieldCacheTermsFilter.java
>
>
> This is a companion to FieldCacheRangeFilter except it operates on a set of
> terms rather than a range. It works best when the set is comparatively large
> or the terms are comparatively common.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
