[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12656659#action_12656659
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1483:
-------------------------------------
bq. haven't tried to track it down yet...
I wouldn't. Well the method I am using passes the tests, its not likely viable
(maybe even on a smaller scale than i would have guessed based on what your
seeing). But since its close, I figure a benchmark of it against using values
should tell us a lot about whether it makes sense to keep pushing with ord. Ord
will no doubt end up a little slower if its to work properly, but comparing
them now should give us a gauge of using values instead. Thats what we were
looking for right?
I still have tons I want to look at in this patch (and hopefully some
ideas/suggestions). I havn't looked at it at all in that context yet though. I
merely sat down and made the tests pass one by one with little consideration
for anything else.
> Change IndexSearcher to use MultiSearcher semantics for multiple subreaders
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch,
> LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch,
> LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch,
> LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch
>
>
> FieldCache and Filters are forced down to a single segment reader, allowing
> for individual segment reloading on reopen.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
