[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12657205#action_12657205
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1483:
--------------------------------------------
{quote}
> I guess I can't get away with my new index calculation either: ords[i] =
> ((-index << 1) - 3) / 2.0d;
{quote}
I think you can use an int for the ords? Now that we have subord,
when you get negative index back from binary search, you can set ord
to -index-1 which is the "lower bound", and then as long as subord is
at least 1 it should compare correctly.
Also, in your 2nd pass, if the list is length 1 then you can
immediately set subord to 1 and move on.
In your first pass, in the "else" clause (when the value was found in
the next segment) don't you need to set subord to 0?
> Change IndexSearcher to use MultiSearcher semantics for multiple subreaders
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1483
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch,
> LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch,
> LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch,
> LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch, LUCENE-1483.patch
>
>
> FieldCache and Filters are forced down to a single segment reader, allowing
> for individual segment reloading on reopen.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
