[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12658062#action_12658062 ]
Erik Hatcher commented on LUCENE-1387: -------------------------------------- I've taken some quick peeks into the code, run the unit tests, nicely packaged and presented! A couple of thoughts: * Maybe the Filter's should be using the DocIdSet API rather than the BitSet deprecated stuff? We can refactor that after being committed I supposed, but not something we want to leave like that. * DistanceQuery is awkwardly named. It's not an (extends) Query.... it's a POJO with helpers. Maybe DistanceQueryFactory? (but it creates a Filter also) * CartesianPolyFilter is not a Filter (but CartesianShapeFilter is) I think this looks good enough to commit as well, just noting the above for cosmetic refactoring consideration after the code is in. > Add LocalLucene > --------------- > > Key: LUCENE-1387 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387 > Project: Lucene - Java > Issue Type: New Feature > Components: contrib/* > Reporter: Grant Ingersoll > Priority: Minor > Attachments: spatial-lucene.zip, spatial.tar.gz, spatial.zip > > > Local Lucene (Geo-search) has been donated to the Lucene project, per > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INCUBATOR-77. This issue is to handle > the Lucene portion of integration. > See http://lucene.markmail.org/message/orzro22sqdj3wows?q=LocalLucene -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org