On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote: > If we forget the bytecode modification for a moment, how much cost does this > add to Lucene when used by a real application with slf4j logging? (e.g. Solr > uses the jdk adapter and no-op adapter cannot be used)
AFAIK, the infostream stuff is only in IndexWriter. There shouldn't be a measurable performance impact. My concerns had more to do with future patches and the places some users may want to start adding logging (potentially anywhere they have ever had a problem). I'm communicating those concerns now to get people to think twice before peppering Lucene full of logging statements. Sometimes a debugger is the right tool for the job instead. -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
