Robert.

* no one is forcing you to be on this mailing list.

* next time you look for a job, and your prospective employer 'googles' you, they are going to find this anti-social behavior. "playing well with others" is usually a key employment criteria people look for. (as well as being super-smart like you are).

Other people have asked you politely to tone it down, but you persist on showing how stupid most of the people on this list are.

Why not leave the stupid people alone (they have already shown they don't understand your finer points) , and go somewhere where you are more appreciated, or better yet.. prove them wrong and build it your way. I'm sure you convince your peers who are forcing you to use such a feeble-minded project that your approach would work better for them.

I've even created a space for you on Google-Code for you to show them:- http://code.google.com/p/roberts-search/

Sincerely
Ian.


robert engels wrote:
I have better things to do than read a 10,000 word incident that discusses about 100 different topics under the generic heading "Further steps towards flexible indexing" in order to answer a simple question.

You are a moron. And I don't mean that in a offensive way - I am using the secondary definition.

Main Entry: *mo·ron *
Pronunciation:\ˈmȯr-ˌän\
Function:noun
Etymology: irregular from Greek /mōros/ foolish, stupid
Date: 1910
*1*/usually offensive/ *:* a mildly mentally retarded person
*2**:* a very stupid person

On Jan 9, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 03:42:35PM -0600, robert engels wrote:
If your index can fit in the IO cache, you should using a completely different implementation...

You should be writing a sequential transaction log for add/update/ delete operations, and storing the entire index in memory (RAMDirectory) - with periodic background flushes of the log.

That'll work too.

If you are running multiple processes (in KS), who is invoking them (inetd or similar?), if not, and users are on the system, you can't control what will happen with the IO cache...

See LUCENE-1458.

Marvin Humphrey


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org <mailto:java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org>




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to