[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12662687#action_12662687
]
paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl edited comment on LUCENE-1345 at 1/10/09 12:14 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------
John, Michael,
bq. Given the perf number improvements we see, can we consider up the priority?
I think most of the performance improvements that John posted can be moved into
trunk without the addition of Filter as a clause to BooleanQuery. Therefore I'd
rather let
these go in before adding Filter as clause to BooleanQuery.
was (Author: paul.elsc...@xs4all.nl):
John, Michael,
bq. Given the perf number improvements we see, can we consider up the priority?
I think most of the performance improvements that John posted can be moved into
trunk without the addition of Filter as a clause to BooleanQuery, so I'd rather
let
these go first.
> Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1345
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: booleansetperf.txt, DisjunctionDISI.java,
> DisjunctionDISI.patch, DisjunctionDISI.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch,
> LUCENE-1345.patch, OpenBitSetIteratorExperiment.java, TestIteratorPerf.java,
> TestIteratorPerf.java
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
