[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12662790#action_12662790
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1345:
---------------------------------------
I know this. My idea was just to remove the burden of thinking about Filters
and Queries for the developer of Lucene applications.
In my opinion, the terms "Query" and "Filter" should be merged. Logic behind
BooleanQuery or Searcher should simply think about the *best" logic how to
optimize what the user wants to do.
Maybe I should create an new JIRA issue out of my suggestion to merge Filters
and Queries? In my opinion, this is something nice to have in 3.0.
> Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1345
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: booleansetperf.txt, DisjunctionDISI.java,
> DisjunctionDISI.patch, DisjunctionDISI.patch,
> LUCENE-1345-Filter+Query-merge.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch,
> OpenBitSetIteratorExperiment.java, TestIteratorPerf.java,
> TestIteratorPerf.java
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
