Also, RangeQuery has already been fixed (on trunk) such that the ctors
that take Term are deprecated.
But the larger point (we need stronger separation of field from text
in XXXQuery classes) is valid.
Mike
Paul Elschot wrote:
On Friday 23 January 2009 05:15:41 Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> I think lots of people here will find this interesting:
>
> http://lingpipe-blog.com/2009/01/21/lucenes-missing-termfield-query-structure/
The problem that term field and value are tied by TermQuery is also
solved in
the Surround query language in contrib, so it's not too difficult to
add a similar
solution as a layer on top of Lucene.
Regards,
Paul Elschot
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
