[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12668954#action_12668954
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1476:
------------------------------------------
> Maybe we should close this issue with a won't-fix and start a new one for
> filtered deletions?
We need more performance data before going ahead with tombstone deletions.
Sounds like the next step.
> BitVector implement DocIdSet, IndexReader returns DocIdSet deleted docs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1476
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1476
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 2.4
> Reporter: Jason Rutherglen
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: hacked-deliterator.patch, LUCENE-1476.patch,
> LUCENE-1476.patch, LUCENE-1476.patch, LUCENE-1476.patch, LUCENE-1476.patch,
> quasi_iterator_deletions.diff, quasi_iterator_deletions_r2.diff,
> quasi_iterator_deletions_r3.diff, searchdeletes.alg, sortBench2.py,
> sortCollate2.py, TestDeletesDocIdSet.java
>
> Original Estimate: 12h
> Remaining Estimate: 12h
>
> Update BitVector to implement DocIdSet. Expose deleted docs DocIdSet from
> IndexReader.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
