[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1457?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1457:
---------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 2.4.1
> There are a few binary search implmentations in lucene that suffer from a now
> well known overflow bug
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1457
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1457
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Mark Miller
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.4.1, 2.9
>
>
> http://googleresearch.blogspot.com/2006/06/extra-extra-read-all-about-it-nearly.html
> The places I see it are:
> MultiSearcher.subSearcher(int)
> TermInfosReader.getIndexOffset(Term)
> MultiSegmentReader.readerIndex(int, int[], int)
> MergeDocIDRemapper.remap(int)
> I havn't taken much time to consider how likely any of these are to overflow.
> The values being averaged would have to be very large. That would rule out
> possible problems for at least a couple of these, but how about something
> like the MergeDocIDRemapper? Is there a document number that could be reached
> that has a chance of triggering this bug? If not we can close this and have a
> record of looking into it.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
