Does the LUCENE-1536 patch create a compound filter out of multiple filters? Then the compound filter is passed down to TermQuery? What is the status of LUCENE-1345?
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > > I don't think anyone is working on it..., because It looks like this is a > real hit to performance (the results I posted on LUCENE-1476). We shouldn't > do it. > > And, in fact, we should consider doing the reverse: taking filters that are > now applied via iteration and instead distributing them down to each > TermQuery (LUCENE-1536) via random-access API (if the filter can support > it); that can give much better performance. > > However I need to redo these tests once LUCENE-1345 is in. > > Mike > > Jason Rutherglen wrote: > > Is anyone working on this? I can't find a patch. I'll start one unless >> someone has something to post. >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
