[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-1398:
-----------------------------------
Attachment: LUCENE-1398.patch
{quote}
I don't know how others feel, but I'd personally like to stop the practice of
making more Analyzer classes whenever a new TokenFilter is added.
This patch looks like it could/should be a single class (other than test of
course): ReverseTokenFilter. The static reverse() methods could be put directly
on that filter.
{quote}
No problem for me. :) Done.
> Add ReverseStringFilter
> -----------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1398
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1398
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Analysis
> Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: LUCENE-1398.patch, LUCENE-1398.patch, LUCENE-1398.patch
>
>
> add ReverseStringFilter and ReverseStringAnalyzer that can be used for
> backword much. For Example, "*ry", "*ing", "*ber".
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
