On Feb 26, 2009, at 12:07 PM, Koren Krupko wrote:
I'm familiar with their work. They implemented only one model and
made very
"model proprietary" changes in the index. In addition, it was done a
long
time ago (not compatible to current versions of Lucene).
I figured as much
My goal is to build
basic LM software infrastructure (indexing + scoring) to allow future
implementation of different other models without touching the core.
I would have liked to insert these changes in a fundamental manner
fully
integrating them into the Lucene project thus allowing code
maintenance and
backward compatibility of future releases.
+1. Like I said, this fits well with the goal of "flexible
indexing" (which should also be called "flexible scoring" or whatever)
so those are things to keep in mind.
Have a look at the How To Contribute section on the wiki and keep in
mind that small incremental, back-compatible patches are often easier
to swallow than very large ones that massively change things.
At any rate, what you are proposing is very interesting and exciting
(to me, anyway).
-Grant
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
