Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Michael McCandless
<luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Signatures also look good (after importing KEYS.txt... it would be
easier to verify if you uploaded your public key to pgp.mit.edu
though)
I did upload it (back for 2.4.0)... I found it, here:
http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6E68DA61
That should work?
oops, OK... user error (me) I think. I recently switched machines,
and I think gpg needs to be set up more (with my private key, etc)
before it can verify.
Here's the misleading output I got:
yo...@odin:~/tmp$ gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --verify
lucene-2.4.1.zip.asc
gpg: Signature made Wed 04 Mar 2009 05:02:59 PM EST using DSA key ID
6E68DA61
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
Sheesh that's weird and quite a misleading error message. If you run
with -v does it give you any more details?
You should file an issue w/ GnuPG ;)
Mike
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
