[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-998?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12680733#action_12680733
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-998:
------------------------------------
One opinion:
The boolean rewrite is a fairly poor method for multi-term queries. It just
doesn't scale well. I think a focus on the constant score rewrite makes more
sense and constant score rewrite will be available for all of the multi-term
queries in the next release. In that vein, I don't personally have a lot of
interest in mucking with how you set the max clause limit. Its a pretty poor
limitation to have to deal with, and I wouldn't be sad to move away from it
longer term.
Others might feel differently though.
> BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount(int) is static
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-998
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-998
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 2.1
> Reporter: Tim Lebedkov
> Attachments: lucene-998.patch
>
>
> BooleanQuery.setMaxClauseCount(int) is static. It does not allow searching in
> multiple indices from different threads using different settings. This
> setting should be probably moved in to the IndexSearcher.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
