(resending msg from earlier today during @apache mail outage -- i didn't get a copy from the list, so i'm assuming no one did)
: Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:51:05 -0700 (PDT) : : : I think we should move TrieRange* into core before 2.9? : : -0 : : I think we should try to move more things *out* of the core in 3.0 (as : i've mentioned in other threads) ... but i certianly understand the : arguments for going the other direction. : : : It's received alot of attention, from both developers (Uwe & Yonik did : : lots of iterations, and Solr is folding it in) and user interest. : : it's a chicken/egg problem that we move things into the core because they : are very useful and we want to give them more visibilty, but if we had : less things in the core and more things in contribs (query parser, spans, : "standard" analyzer, non-primative Query impls, etc...) then contribs as a : whole would be more visible. ... I'm getting a sense of deja-vu, ah : yes, here it is ... : : http://www.nabble.com/Moving-SweetSpotSimilarity-out-of-contrib-to19267437.html#a19320894 : : : -Hoss : : -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
