[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12688449#action_12688449
]
Mike Klaas commented on LUCENE-1561:
------------------------------------
I agree that it is going to be almost impossible to convey that phrase queries
don't work by renaming the flag. I agree with Eks Dev that a positive
formulation is the only chance, although this deviates from the current omit*
flags.
termPresenceOnly()
trackTermPresenceOnly()
onlyTermPresence()
omitEverythingButTermPresence() // just kidding
> Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and strengthen the javadocs
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1561
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Index
> Affects Versions: 2.4.1
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-1561.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from here:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/search-problem-when-indexed-using-Field.setOmitTf()-td22456141.html
> Maybe rename omitTf to something like omitTermPositions, and make it clear
> what queries will silently fail to work as a result.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
