You're right ... I missed that. My fault :) On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 12:18 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > bq. I personally don't understand why MRHC was invented in the first > place. > > > > The evolution of MRHC is in the comments of LUCENE-1483 - a lot of > comments > > to wade through though. > > MRHC was created because simply adding setNextReader to HC would break > back compat, because collect(...) is called on the un-rebased doc. Ie > we need a new class so we can tell that it will handle re-basing the > doc itself. > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
