[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12698142#action_12698142
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1596:
--------------------------------------
Yes, *if* you are doing low level stuff directly on the MultiReader, like using
TermEnum/TermDocs. Or calling Filter.getBits(multiReader). As you probably
know, if you pass Filters or Queries to an IndexSearcher, it's now dropping
down to the segment level already (a scorer is created per-segment) so it won't
hit the MultiTermEnum code.
> optimize MultiTermEnum/MultiTermDocs
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1596
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1596
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Assignee: Yonik Seeley
> Attachments: LUCENE-1596.patch
>
>
> Optimize MultiTermEnum and MultiTermDocs to avoid seeks on TermDocs that
> don't match the term.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
