[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12700961#action_12700961
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1345:
--------------------------------------
The interesting thing to benchmark is filtered queries. One could do this by
adding the filter as a required clause to a BooleanQuery in IndexSearcher, and
see whether filtered queries are faster with that implementation. This part
should work normally with the current patch.
In case that turns out to make a real difference, it might also be considered
to deprecate all the Searcher methods that take a Filter argument, and indicate
the preferred alternative implementation with a Filter as a clause to
BooleanQuery in the javadocs.
Now, if I could find the time to get this last bug out of the current patch...
> Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1345
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Search
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.9
>
> Attachments: booleansetperf.txt, DisjunctionDISI.java,
> DisjunctionDISI.patch, DisjunctionDISI.patch,
> LUCENE-1345-Filter+Query-merge.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch,
> LUCENE-1345.patch, OpenBitSetIteratorExperiment.java, TestIteratorPerf.java,
> TestIteratorPerf.java
>
>
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
