ok then I'll open an issue and post the patch. You can review it and give it a try
Shai On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > This sounds like a great change! It would also allow us to test the > other (index, store, etc.) packages too? > > I don't think this is possible today, though I'm no expert with ant so > it's entirely possible I've missed it. > > Presumably once we "modularize", then the "module" would be the > natural unit for testing (but it seems like this will be a ways > off...). > > Mike > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Shai Erera <ser...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi > > > > I noticed that one can define "testcase" to execute just one test class, > > which is convenient. However, I didn't notice any equivalent for testing > a > > whole package. Lately, when handling all those search issues, I often > wanted > > to run all the tests in o.a.l.search and just them, but couldn't so I > either > > ran a single test class when it was obvious (like TestSort) or the > > "test-core" when it was less obvious (like changes to Collector, or > > BooleanScorer). > > > > I wrote a simple patch which adds this capability to common-build.xml. I > > would like to confirm first that you agree to add this change and that I > > didn't miss it and this capability exists elsewhere already. > > > > Shai > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
