[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1619?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12703537#action_12703537
 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1619:
--------------------------------------------

Indeed it seems unnecessary -- I'll commit.  Thanks Eks!

> TermAttribute.termLength() optimization
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1619
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1619
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Analysis
>            Reporter: Eks Dev
>            Assignee: Michael McCandless
>            Priority: Trivial
>         Attachments: LUCENE-1619.patch
>
>
>    public int termLength() {
>      initTermBuffer(); // This patch removes this method call 
>      return termLength;
>    }
> I see no reason to initTermBuffer() in termLength()... all tests pass, but I 
> could be wrong?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to