You might check out this Solr exchange : http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/b2ccc68ca834129/lucene_2_9_migration_issues_multireader_vs_indexreader_document_ids

There are a few suggestions throughout.


--
- Mark

http://www.lucidimagination.com



Uwe Schindler wrote:

What is the problem exactly? Maybe you use the new Collector API, where the search is done for each segment, so caching does not work correctly?

-----
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de

------------------------------------------------------------------------

*From:* patrick o'leary [mailto:pj...@pjaol.com]
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 28, 2009 10:31 PM
*To:* java-dev@lucene.apache.org
*Subject:* ReadOnlyMultiSegmentReader bitset id vs doc id

hey

I've got a filter that's storing document id's with a geo distance for spatial lucene using a bitset position for doc id,
However with a MultiSegmentReader that's no longer going to working.

What's the most appropriate way to go from bitset position to doc id now?

Thanks
Patrick






---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to