On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Michael McCandless <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Yonik Seeley > <yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > >> Selecting backward compatibility vs latest and greatest could be done >> w/o Settings (a simple static int containing the version number to act >> like). It seems like the Settings debate should be based on it's own >> merits. > > But isn't a static int too restrictive? That means all usage of > Lucene from within this JRE must match that version?
Isn't that currently the case though? One Lucene jar, one behavior. -Yonik --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
