Is this the time and place to re-raise a previous discussion about moving SweetSpotSimilarity to core and move to use it?
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 8:54 PM, Michael McCandless < luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Robert Muir <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > none of my queries are "wicked fast" on 100M doc index! > > OK. > > > for narrow queries, we are talking about ~100ms queries becoming ~400ms > or > > so with the constant score rewrite... > > for wide queries, we are talking about maybe 3 or 4s queries becoming 2s > or > > so with the constant score rewrite..., it depends on how wide the query > > is... > > > > I agree with fixing the "wicked slow" queries, but currently I think the > > general case would lose pretty bad (the way it works now), and only a > corner > > case wins. > > I opened LUCENE-1644 for this; I think if we can do constant score > BooleanQuery, then MultiTermQuery is free to pick & choose the best > way to run the query. > > Mike > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > >
