> That bug has led to 'base' having a compromised reputation among elite users > because of intermittent, inexplicable flakiness. Is that what you want for > Lucene? While I agree with that point, Lucene already has lots and lots of static configuration. Having actsAsVersion won't add any new woes. Well, it won't remove them either.
I dislike both single static variable approach and Settings object you have to pass into each end every constructor. If I absolutely must choose and have no right to just throw all these back-compat crutches out of the window, I'd choose a single static variable. On the offnote, it's amusing to see how the discussion is calming down and will seemingly end in minor amendmends to the policy, if any at all :) -- Kirill Zakharenko/Кирилл Захаренко (ear...@gmail.com) Home / Mobile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423 ICQ: 104465785 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
