On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 01:22:24PM -0400, Michael McCandless wrote: > > Sounds like an argument for more frequent major releases. > > Yeah. Or "rebranding" what we now call minor as major releases, by > changing our policy ;)
Not sure how much of that is a jest, bug I don't think that's a good idea. It violates commonly held expectations about what constitutes a "minor release". Of course, I'm not sure to what extent modified interfaces will surprise people. At least that's compile-time... but then it will make it harder for multiple apps with Lucene depenencies to coexist. > Will Lucy do scoring when sorting by field, by default? Nope. Why would we do that? The only reason you're doing it in Lucene is to preserve back compat, and Lucy doesn't have that constraint. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
