Hi guys:
I am interested in what is the latest decision on webluke - I
downloaded the zip, tried it and love it!
Does it support all Luke's functionality? (especially the plugin
support)
Thanks
-John
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 7:09 AM, Uwe Schindler <u...@thetaphi.de> wrote:
> Here another Servlet 2.3 compatible container:
>
> http://panfmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/panfmp/tools/mini-webserver/trunk/
>
> It does not support web.xml files (instead uses a simple properties file),
> but it supports almost everything needed to get simple servlets running
> with
> path mappings etc. The support for web.xml was left out because of
> compatibility with very old java versions without xml support and to keep
> it
> small. JAR file is about 39 KB plus servlet.jar version 2.3 without JSP
> classes (31 KB) and commons-logging.
>
> We use it currenty for a CD-ROM based Lucene search engine. It's licensed
> in
> "Apache 2.0" and Java 1.3 compatible (no generics, StringBuffer). The SVN
> currenty lacks documentation and startup shell scripts, but a working
> config
> file is supplied.
>
> The SVN contains a little bit more jar files, but needed is only
> webserver.jar, servlet-2.3.jar and commons-logging.jar. Some features are,
> that the static content servlet can serve files directly from ZIP files
> (e.g., http://localhost/file.zip/some/example.txt).
>
> -----
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Nadav Har'El [mailto:n...@math.technion.ac.il]
> > Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2008 3:08 PM
> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: WebLuke - include Jetty in Lucene binary distribution?
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 09, 2007, markharw00d wrote about "WebLuke - include Jetty in
> > Lucene binary distribution?":
> > > The only open question is if we should bundle Jetty in the Lucene
> binary
> > > distribution as part of the build packaging. This could be used to
> > > launch both WebLuke and the existing luceneweb.war but adds about 6 or
> 7
> > > meg to the overall zipped download size.
> > > Thoughts?
> >
> > My thoughts is that 6-7 MB for a tiny HTTP Server and/or servlet engine
> is
> > way, way, too much. I'm surprise that Jetty, originally intended to be
> > simple
> > and embeddable, reached that size (which is 10 times larger than Lucene's
> > core,
> > for example)!
> >
> > For demo purposes, I wrote myself something similar, and its
> > (uncompressed)
> > .class size is:
> > 14 K for the basic HTTP server
> > 24 K for the servlet container (jaxax.servlet API support)
> > And there's also the Servlet API itself from Sun, at around 40 K (this is
> > part
> > of J2EE but not of J2SE, so you need to include this as well if you want
> > to
> > use the servlet API). And that's it.
> >
> > I'm sure that similar tiny Web Servers can also be found on the Web, but
> > if
> > there's interest, I can see about publishing mine.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Nadav Har'El | Sunday, Apr 27 2008, 22 Nisan
> > 5768
> > IBM Haifa Research Lab
> |-------------------------------------
> > ----
> > |Why do we drive on a parkway and
> park
> > on
> > http://nadav.harel.org.il |a driveway?
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>
>
