[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1167?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718285#action_12718285
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1167:
-------------------------------------
I wouldn't argue against doing this, but personally, I think the current model
is fine as well:
if there is a back compat stated, great, if not, there are no back compat
commitments.
> add compatibility statement to README.txt for all contribs
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1167
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1167
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: contrib/*
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Fix For: 2.9
>
>
> as discussed on the mailing list, all contribs are not created equally, and
> we should including the comments about the backwards compatibility of each
> contrib in the README.txt before the next release
> http://www.nabble.com/Back-Compatibility-to14918202.html#a14918202
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
