On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Yonik Seeley<yo...@lucidimagination.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Mark Miller <markrmil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The computer should handle that >> for me. It really should be as easy >> as saying, look I want the best new defaults, or I want the back compat >> defaults. The computer should figure >> out the rest for me. > > actsAsVersion ;-) > nice and back compatible. > Introduce Settings classes in the future when+where it makes sense.
+1 But, per class (not global), and on an as-needed basis. I still think this is a good, simple solution to implementing our back-compat... so I opened LUCENE-1684 to add a "matchVersion" arg to StandardAnalyzer, and I think it actually works very well. Mike --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
