[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12718938#action_12718938
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1689:
-------------------------------------
my example has some "issues" (i.e. it depends upon the knowledge that no
surrogate pairs lowercase to BMP codepoints).
it also doesn't correctly handle invalid unicode data (unpaired surrogates).
Such complexity can be all added to the slower-path supplementary case. the
intent is just to show it wouldnt be a terribly invasive change.
Thanks!
> supplementary character handling
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1689
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LUCENE-1689_lowercase_example.txt
>
>
> for Java 5. Java 5 is based on unicode 4, which means variable-width encoding.
> supplementary character support should be fixed for code that works with
> char/char[]
> For example:
> StandardAnalyzer, SimpleAnalyzer, StopAnalyzer, etc should at least be
> changed so they don't actually remove suppl characters, or modified to look
> for surrogates and behave correctly.
> LowercaseFilter should be modified to lowercase suppl. characters correctly.
> CharTokenizer should either be deprecated or changed so that isTokenChar()
> and normalize() use int.
> in all of these cases code should remain optimized for the BMP case, and
> suppl characters should be the exception, but still work.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
